Differentiating Between Qualitative and Quantitative Methods

Please no plagiarism and make sure you are able to access all resource on your own before you bid. Main references come from Balkin, R. S., & Kleist, D. M. (2017) and/or American Psychological Association (2014). You need to have scholarly support for any claim of fact or recommendation regarding treatment. APA format also requires headings. Use the prompt each week to guide your heading titles and organize the content of your initial post under the appropriate headings. Remember to use scholarly research from peer-reviewed articles that is current. Please follow the instructions to get full credit for the discussion. I need this completed by 10/01/19 at 6pm.
Discussion – Week 6
Differentiating Between Qualitative and Quantitative Methods

Save your time – order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now

Learning how to differentiate between qualitative and quantitative research methodology is a critical skill necessary for analyzing empirical research. For this Discussion, you will analyze the similarities and differences between qualitative and quantitative methodology. Also, you will critically examine a research question to determine the best method to investigate the question.
To Prepare

Review the Learning Resources for this week and consider the      differences between qualitative and quantitative methods.
Consider the question, “How does music impact mood?”
Think about ways you could research this question      quantitatively and qualitatively.

Note: You are required to post your response to the Discussion thread before you are able to view others’ responses.
By Day 3
Based on the question, “How does music impact mood?”:

Explain how you could quantitatively investigate how music      impacts mood.
Explain how you could qualitatively investigate how music      impacts mood.
Which do you think is better for investigating this question?      Support your answer with scholarly sources.

Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.
Required Resources
Balkin, R. S., & Kleist, D. M. (2017). Counseling research: A practitioner-scholar approach. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.

Chapter 4, “Types of Research”
Chapter 5, “Fundamental Concepts in Quantitative      Research”
Chapter 10, “Fundamental Concepts in Qualitative      Research”

Required Media
Laureate Education (Producer). (2017e). Introduction to research design [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 14 minutes.
Accessible player  –Downloads– Download Video w/CC Download Audio Download Transcript
Credit: Provided courtesy of the Laureate International Network of Universities.
Laureate Education (Producer). (2017m). Roundtable: Research methods [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 26 minutes.
Accessible player  –Downloads– Download Video w/CC Download Audio Download Transcript
Credit: Provided courtesy of the Laureate International Network of Universities.
Optional Resources
Laureate Education (Producer). (2017). Quantitative methods: An example [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 13 minutes.
Accessible player  –Downloads– Download Video w/CC Download Audio Download Transcript
Credit: Provided courtesy of the Laureate International Network of Universities.
Laureate Education (Producer). (2017). Qualitative methods: An example [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 11 minutes.
Accessible player  –Downloads– Download Video w/CC Download Audio Download Transcript

Introduction to Research Design
© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. 1
Introduction to Research Design Program Transcript
NARRATOR: Doctor Michael Patton begins this course on research design by introducing the topic of research and contextualizing it in the scholar practitioner model. He concludes the program with a discussion of two terms he believes should be in the vocabulary and consciousness of a scholar practitioner– epistemology and ontology.
MICHAEL PATTON: I want to welcome you into the world of the scholar practitioner. So let’s talk about that world and what it means to be a scholar practitioner. A scholar is someone who studies how the world is to learn about the world, to contribute to knowledge about the world. And part of what distinguishes research from our ordinary walking through the world and being in the world is not only paying attention to it more systematically, but the commitment to record how we do that, to publish for others to review what our findings are and in particular, what methods we used to come up with those findings.
What you’ll find in the world of scholarship is that the controversies are actually not so much about the findings. The controversies are about the methods. How did you find out what you found out? The method finding linkage is key. And so as a scholar, you have an obligation and a commitment to record not only your findings, but to document in great detail where those findings came from.
How did you arrive at those conclusions? What instruments did you use? What was your sample? What was your relationship to the thing that you were studying? It is that commitment to studying the world, to understand how it unfolds that makes you a scholar. A practitioner is someone who is trying to make a difference in the world, trying to help people, trying to change systems, trying to improve programs.
And that linkage then between the scholar and a practitioner is that a scholar practitioner is someone who uses the skills and the knowledge that comes out of scholarship to inform their action in the world, to inform their practice. Let me give you a favorite example. My daughter was born without one ear. And as she became a teenager, we began talking with their about whether or not she wanted to have reconstructive surgery to have an ear built.
And we located one of the world’s, by reputation, best reconstructive surgeons and went to see him. And he talked to my daughter and showed her what he would do. But in addition to that, he had followed up all of the people on whom he had performed reconstructive surgery. He had interviews with them, and he was able to show my daughter satisfaction rates of different people who have had their ears rebuilt, and was able to show her data from teenage girls who were the
 

 
Introduction to Research Design
© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. 2
least satisfied of his clientele, because they had such high expectations about how this would change their lives.
So as a part of his practice, a skilled reconstructive surgeon, he provided her with data about how people like her responded to this surgery, the impact on their lives, and was able to gather data from her and help her think about what her life was like now, how it might be different, what her expectations were, and compare that to data from other people like her.
He was a scholar practitioner as a reconstructive surgeon. If you’re in psychological practice, if you’re in a clinic, if you’re in education, part of being a scholar practitioner is to follow up the impact of your work and find out, are you making the difference you want to make? We call that reality testing.
A scholar practitioner is careful not to fool themselves about the impact they have. We know from psychology that we all have rose colored glasses. We all have selective perception. As basically animals, we prefer pleasure to pain. And so we’d like to think that we’re doing good, that we’re making a difference. The scholar practitioner brings to that desire to make the world a better place a commitment to empirically validate whether or not those hopes are actually being realized.
Are you making a difference? That can be a scary question because it’s easier in some ways to live the unexamined life, to engage in the unexamined practice. The commitment of a scholar practitioner is to say, here’s what I hope to accomplish. This is the difference I hope to make. This is the contribution I hope to make, and then to employ the methods of research to find out is that how it turned out.
How do you know that you’re doing good? Not just that you hope to do good, but how do you know? And that requires having criteria. That requires having data. That requires being willing to ask that hard questions about what difference you’re making. The scholar practitioner is committed to changing what’s going on to get a better result.
And that means using the methods of research in systematic inquiry to examine the effects of your practice to improve your practice. Now, many of you are unlikely to be full-time researchers, full-time scholars. You will, however, throughout your life as a practitioner, be a lifetime consumer of research. We live in the knowledge age.
Knowledge is the currency of our time. To be an effective citizen, to be an effective participant in democracy, to be an effective practitioner, to be an effective parent, to be an effective colleague, to be an effective spouse, there is knowledge about what works and doesn’t work in those arenas. There’s also a
 

 
Introduction to Research Design
© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. 3
huge amount of garbage out there, especially with the internet spewing garbage all the time.
One of the commitments of a scholar practitioner is to be able to tell knowledge from junk, is to be able to distinguish stuff that is true and validated and reliable from the stuff that people make up, where they assert things on the basis of their values and hopes that simply aren’t true. So regardless of whether or not you conduct a great deal of research, you will always be consuming research.
What diets work? What foods should you consume and not consume? What’s the effect of red wine? What’s the effect of caffeine? What kind of exercise programs work? What statements do politicians make that are true and not true?
It’s important for you to know those things. As a consumer, you need to be concerned about knowledge, about facts, about what’s going on in the world. That makes you a sophisticated consumer. And learning how to tell solid research, learning how to tell cumulative research becomes a part of that practice. The scholar practitioner brings to their own practice an attitude of skepticism, an attitude that you need evidence to make claims.
This is one of the areas where I find students get in the most difficulty, especially in psychology, but in the social sciences in general is many people who come to adult education come with a lot of experience and with strong beliefs about what works and doesn’t work. Many psychologists are involved in a form of practice where they’re in a particular tradition of psychology or operating at a particular model, or doing some techniques that they’ve been using for a while.
And I work with those students and ask them why they’ve come into a master’s program or a doctoral program. And what they often say is, I want to prove that my model works. That’s not the mindset of a scholar practitioner. That’s public relations. That’s advertising. To try to convince people that something you believe is true is PR, is advertising, is persuasion.
What a scholar practitioner wants to do is inquire into whether or not what you’re doing works. You bring then an openness to it, a reality testing attitude to it. Research is not about proving you’re right. Research is about studying how the world is.
And you may or may not be effective in what you’re doing. That is what this gives you an opportunity to do, to learn about what works and doesn’t work, not to try to prove a prejudice, not to prove a pre-disposition, not to support your biases, but to find out how the world works. Now, the beauty of that is– and I want to speak directly to the anxiety that students often have when they come to research– the beauty of that is that you cannot fail.
 

 
Introduction to Research Design
© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. 4
To find out that your model doesn’t work is not failure. That’s knowledge. That’s learning. The world is the way it is. Our task is to find out how it is. That’s the challenge. To discover that the way we thought it is isn’t the way it is not failure. It’s knowledge. Our history as a species is filled with propositions that turned out to be false.
That’s how we build knowledge. So you can’t fail at this unless you come to it with a closed mind, manipulating the data to try to make it come out the way you want to make it come out. To be genuinely open to the way the world is, and to find out how it is, and to record your methods of inquiry so that others can see how you arrived at your conclusions, and to use those conclusions to inform your practice, that’s what makes you a scholar practitioner. As you enter the world of scholarship, you’re going to encounter jargon.
There are words that scholars have used that laypeople often make fun of or don’t understand or are intimidated by. And of course, as practitioners, you know about jargon in your areas of practice. Every discipline has jargon that is language it creates for its own use to distinguish things that it thinks are important. In science and research in general, two important words that you will encounter in this journey are epistemology and ontology.
And I encourage you as a scholar practitioner to practice those words so that they roll off your tongue and you can share them with people or respond to them when you encounter somebody who may ask you, what’s your epistemological prospective? Epistemology is the study of knowledge. How do we know what we know?
And this is an important distinction within the scholar practitioner framework, because the framing of a scholar practitioner has a particular epistemology. One kind of epistemology, the one that’s dominant in much of research and traditional social science that’s called values-free social science is that the way to study the world, the way to know the world is to be separated from the world, is to be outside, is to be independent, is to be objective, is to not be involved in what’s going on in the world. That’s in that epistemological stance. It says you can best know the world by being separate from it.
The scholar practitioner epistemology asserts that you could best know the world by being engaged in it, that by being engaged, by being part of the world, you get access to things through your direct experience with lived experience that by understanding what’s happening to you as a part of your engagement, you get deeper insight into how the world is.
So that’s an epistemological stance, one that you will have the opportunity to deepen throughout this scholar practitioner journey. And I simply introduce that term to you now so that you can pay attention to it and ask yourself, how do I
 

 
Introduction to Research Design
© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. 5
know what I know? What are my sources of knowledge? How do I deal with my own biases? How do I try to acknowledge bias? How do I control bias?
What are different sources of knowledge? How do I establish the credibility of these different sources of knowledge? Those are epistemological questions. Ontology, about the nature of reality, is especially important in psychological research because it addresses the issue of, what is it that we’re studying? What is the world made up of?
Clearly, there is a physical world. There is the world that is made up of tables and chairs and roads and trees. There’s a world of living things. One of the ontological issues in psychology and in the social sciences is whether the nature of reality for human beings is different in some way than that physical world. For example, there is the constructivist perspective that says our language and our participation in a particular culture and a particular society conditions our experience of the world so that what we think is real is actually a matter of perception. It’s not real.
It’s what we’ve learned from our culture. We’ve been taught to think of certain things as real. And that makes them real because we think that they are real. The very notion of a table is a cultural construct from that point of view.
In the physical world, there is simply this structure, but we know certain structures as something we call a table. One of the classic examples of constructivism is the difference between a hamburger and a cheeseburger in American culture. Here are these two things they can have all kinds of condiments and different kinds of bread and different degrees of fat in the meat and it can be made on the grill or some other way. But we decided that adding a piece of cheese to this thing is in a different category than everything else that we may do to a burger.
Well, that’s a construction. And looking at how we’ve constructed reality is one version of ontology. In this scholar practitioner journey then, you’ll be invited to think about, how do you know what you know? And what do you think about, what are your assumptions about what it is you’re studying, the very nature of reality itself? Those are big time jargony words, and over the course of this journey, they will hopefully become more real to you, because as a scholar practitioner, you will be expected to have an epistemological and ontological point of view.
So I welcome you and invite you into the world of the scholar practitioner. It’s going to be a wonderful journey. You’ll learn ways of inquiring into how the world is and how your practice is to improve that practice. And that will serve you well, both in being a participant in this world and in changing it in the ways that you want to change it.
 

 
Introduction to Research Design
© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. 6
 
Introduction to Research Design Additional Content Attribution MUSIC: Creative Support Services Los Angeles, CA Dimension Sound Effects Library Newnan, GA Narrator Tracks Music Library Stevens Point, WI Signature Music, Inc Chesterton, IN St

 
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”